Skip to main content

RR on BBC Radio Norfolk taking on Bob Young of the NFU

'Rupert Read on the BBC welcoming the E.U. Parliament's vote banning harmful pesticides. Go to 20 minutes in, listen, and enjoy!'

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/p001xhsw/Matthew_Gudgin_13_01_2009/

Comments

Unknown said…
I thoroughly agreed with you! Bob Young gave the example of pharmaceutical drugs being dangerous but a couple of paracetemol for a headache supposedly wouldn't cause harm to the patient. Pharmaceutical drugs have clear instructions on the packet and warn us not to exceed the stated dose. How do we know what is in apples, bananas or wheat, for example? How many chemical infested examples or these can we eat without risk of cancer etc?

In my opinion someone with cancer would have far more disruption and change to their life than a farmer who has to give up a banned pesticide.

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...