Skip to main content

No to Royal Mail privatisation [Media release]

Green Party condemns Royal Mail Privatisation Plans

Eastern Region Green Party has condemned Government plans to partially privatise the Royal Mail postal services.

Business secretary Lord Mandelson has supported the conclusions of a report by an independent review panel led by businessman Richard Hooper which advised selling 25% - 33% of Royal Mail to a foreign buyer. The current pension fund debt, which may deter potential investors, would first be taken on by the Government (1).

The proposals have already proved highly controversial. It is estimated that up to 100 MPs would take part in a backbench rebellion if the current plans went to a vote without modification (2). Jim McGovern MP has resigned his post as Private Secretary to Postal Affairs Minister Pat McFadden in protest (3). And the Communications Workers Union has stated that it will disaffiliate from the Labour Party in the event of any form of privatisation (4).

The proposal also contradicts Labour's manifesto commitment to a "publicly owned Royal Mail."

Prospective Green MEP for Eastern Region, Councillor Rupert Read said:

"We strongly oppose any privatisation of Royal Mail. The Green Party has long campaigned against transferring essential public services to private hands.

"The Royal Mail is a cherished and trusted national institution first established as a public body by Oliver Cromwell. Even Margaret Thatcher thought it should remain publicly owned (5).

"Privatisation benefits big business interests, not consumers. We have seen this in the NHS, BT and the railways, to name a few instances. A report by Postwatch, the consumer watchdog, has failed to find any significant benefits to individual users from the 'liberalisation' of the postal service (6).

"Private companies will cherry-pick the most profitable parts of the organization which currently fund essential but unprofitable services like rural collections, leaving the public to pick up the bill in the future and leaving Eastern Region with a poorer service.

"To call for the part-privatisation of a major British institution at a time when the dangers of "the market" have been so clearly exposed in recent months is clearly madness. The substantial job losses called for by this report are the last thing our struggling economy needs at the moment.

"Royal Mail has just announced an impressive new environmentally-responsible method of business mail http://www.precisionmarketing.co.uk/Articles/258257/Royal+Mail+rewards+%27green%27+companies.html 

"This is a great example of what a public service provides and I am concerned that a privatised postal service would not come up with such innovative ideas."

ENDS

Notes to editors:

 

  1. For the complete report by Richard Hooper see http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/16_12_08_royalmail.pdf
  2. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/3999246/Labour-MPs-demand-limit-on-private-ownership-of-Royal-Mail.html
  3. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/dec/17/jim-mcgovern-quits-royal-mail
  4. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/dec/16/royal-mail-post-tradeunions
  5. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/dec/17/royal-mail-post-office-privatisation
  6. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/dec/16/royal-mail-post-tradeunions

Comments

Orwell said…
Fake privitization in the field of postal services were put into action last year in Japan. Only afeter one year, the undertaking inovolves a lot of corrupt of real estate properties. The conspiracies of the market fundamentalism are now ended as seen in the collapse of the bubble economy but in some parts of the world the still the cult of neo-liberalism is pursuing rampant and destructive policies.
14 January 2009 at 10:22
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Medialens under the lens, over Syria and Libya: Becoming the new Dave Sparts?

I have long been an active supporter of Medialens ( http://www.medialens.org/ ). Like many others, I have supported them with money, time, tips, and I have been proud to have done so. For they have done very important groundbreaking work over the years challenging the inanities and distortions of the 'mainstream' media. They have for example written important critiques of mainstream media coverage of dangerous climate change, of Iraq Body Count, of the corporate nature of most of our media, and much more besides. They have held the corporate media to account time and again. They ought to be saluted for all of that. It is therefore with a sense of deep regret (as well as of some foreboding) that I have finally to write to address the ways in which, lately, some of the wheels seem to be coming off their wagon. An early warning sign perhaps was their long-running spat with George Monbiot, over the Rwandan genocide and the terrible atr...
16 comments
Read more

'Scandal' over hacked climate-science emails at UEA: Don't believe the hype

The 'scandal' of the hacked emails from Environmental Science at UEA ( http://www.uea.ac.uk/mac/comm/media/press/2009/nov/homepagenews/CRU-update - this includes a direct rebuttal of the single seemingly most-damaging email, the 'trick' email), my University, has been gotten out of all proportion in some of the right-wing media, old and new. I have now read a good number of the 'worst' of the hacked emails. I also know a few of the protagonists personally, and for human-interest value the hacked emails certainly do offer some tidbits. But: When the dust settles, I predict that the climate-deniers will be left holding onto hardly anything, here. There is so far as I can tell at this (still-admittedly-early) stage no significant scientific scandal, and most importantly absolutely no reason to doubt any of the fundamentals of the science of manmade climate change here, just a few unpleasant or silly or (at worst) unwise and bad-practice emails. Scient...
17 comments
Read more