Skip to main content

No to Royal Mail privatisation [Media release]

Green Party condemns Royal Mail Privatisation Plans

Eastern Region Green Party has condemned Government plans to partially privatise the Royal Mail postal services.

Business secretary Lord Mandelson has supported the conclusions of a report by an independent review panel led by businessman Richard Hooper which advised selling 25% - 33% of Royal Mail to a foreign buyer. The current pension fund debt, which may deter potential investors, would first be taken on by the Government (1).

The proposals have already proved highly controversial. It is estimated that up to 100 MPs would take part in a backbench rebellion if the current plans went to a vote without modification (2). Jim McGovern MP has resigned his post as Private Secretary to Postal Affairs Minister Pat McFadden in protest (3). And the Communications Workers Union has stated that it will disaffiliate from the Labour Party in the event of any form of privatisation (4).

The proposal also contradicts Labour's manifesto commitment to a "publicly owned Royal Mail."

Prospective Green MEP for Eastern Region, Councillor Rupert Read said:

"We strongly oppose any privatisation of Royal Mail. The Green Party has long campaigned against transferring essential public services to private hands.

"The Royal Mail is a cherished and trusted national institution first established as a public body by Oliver Cromwell. Even Margaret Thatcher thought it should remain publicly owned (5).

"Privatisation benefits big business interests, not consumers. We have seen this in the NHS, BT and the railways, to name a few instances. A report by Postwatch, the consumer watchdog, has failed to find any significant benefits to individual users from the 'liberalisation' of the postal service (6).

"Private companies will cherry-pick the most profitable parts of the organization which currently fund essential but unprofitable services like rural collections, leaving the public to pick up the bill in the future and leaving Eastern Region with a poorer service.

"To call for the part-privatisation of a major British institution at a time when the dangers of "the market" have been so clearly exposed in recent months is clearly madness. The substantial job losses called for by this report are the last thing our struggling economy needs at the moment.

"Royal Mail has just announced an impressive new environmentally-responsible method of business mail http://www.precisionmarketing.co.uk/Articles/258257/Royal+Mail+rewards+%27green%27+companies.html 

"This is a great example of what a public service provides and I am concerned that a privatised postal service would not come up with such innovative ideas."

ENDS

Notes to editors:

 

  1. For the complete report by Richard Hooper see http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/bsp/hi/pdfs/16_12_08_royalmail.pdf
  2. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/3999246/Labour-MPs-demand-limit-on-private-ownership-of-Royal-Mail.html
  3. http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/dec/17/jim-mcgovern-quits-royal-mail
  4. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/dec/16/royal-mail-post-tradeunions
  5. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/dec/17/royal-mail-post-office-privatisation
  6. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/dec/16/royal-mail-post-tradeunions

Comments

Orwell said…
Fake privitization in the field of postal services were put into action last year in Japan. Only afeter one year, the undertaking inovolves a lot of corrupt of real estate properties. The conspiracies of the market fundamentalism are now ended as seen in the collapse of the bubble economy but in some parts of the world the still the cult of neo-liberalism is pursuing rampant and destructive policies.
14 January 2009 at 10:22
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

Post a Comment
Read more

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...
2 comments
Read more