Skip to main content

Green jobs now!

 
 

As the financial and economic crisis deepens, the sharp reminder of other problems, given by the spike in oil prices, has faded as pump prices fall back below £1 a litre.

Governments, in the UK and elsewhere, have clearly shown through their clumsy responses that they fail to understand how to correct the economic downturn in ways that will also end climate damage and prepare for the decline in supplies of oil.

Although the mechanisms of tax, credit, money supply and exchange rates are complex, the job losses and eroded savings distressing, and the sudden demise of household-name businesses worrying, the shape of a solution is simple.

Experts forecast that our Gross National Product will fall about 3% in 2009, which means that 3% plus of the productive capacity of our economy will be unused. 3% of our work force will be unemployed, 3% of machines idle, building sites and shops empty, a waste of resources.

What is needed is to divert that wasted 3% into "investment in the low carbon economy," which is not the dream of a woolly-hatted eco-protester but the sober recommendation of Sir Nicholas Stern in his 2006 Climate Change advice commissioned by HM Treasury. Putting this advice into practice in the face of the financial storms would require political will and bold measures, but not the ones applied in the last few months.

It should be obvious by now that insolvent banks will not readily lend money, and that businesses will not borrow to invest, even at zero interest, if they cannot see a way of making a profit thereby. Equally obvious is that few people will boost the UK economy as a result of a small cut in VAT; prudent folk will spend less and reduce their credit card debts, while foolish folk will spend on electronic consumer goods, boosting the Chinese economy, but not British jobs. Government infrastructure projects will create local jobs, but it is hard to depict accelerated road building as "investing in a low carbon economy !"

Government should instead use our money to employ building workers to improve home insulation and install solar panels, road engineers to construct cycle paths, and car workers to build buses. This, and more investment and jobs along similar lines would restart the economy while reducing dangerous climate change and preparing for the post-oil world to come.

This is what the Green Party believes in -- this is our 'Green New Deal' proposal. This is what Britain badly needs, in 2009...

Green jobs now!

.

__,_._,___

Comments

peruviansun said…
Not sure about the logic of your successive 3%s but I do agree that if the government is to embark on public works programmes the focus should be on the green economy. Gloomy forecasters tell us to expect environmental considerations to slip down the list of priorities in face of more urgent concerns. But you argue convincingly that job creation and investment can and should centre on green projects. 2009 is a fantastic opportunity but will the government use it ?

Popular posts from this blog

Medialens under the lens, over Syria and Libya: Becoming the new Dave Sparts?

I have long been an active supporter of Medialens ( http://www.medialens.org/ ). Like many others, I have supported them with money, time, tips, and I have been proud to have done so. For they have done very important groundbreaking work over the years challenging the inanities and distortions of the 'mainstream' media. They have for example written important critiques of mainstream media coverage of dangerous climate change, of Iraq Body Count, of the corporate nature of most of our media, and much more besides. They have held the corporate media to account time and again. They ought to be saluted for all of that. It is therefore with a sense of deep regret (as well as of some foreboding) that I have finally to write to address the ways in which, lately, some of the wheels seem to be coming off their wagon. An early warning sign perhaps was their long-running spat with George Monbiot, over the Rwandan genocide and the terrible atr...

'Scandal' over hacked climate-science emails at UEA: Don't believe the hype

The 'scandal' of the hacked emails from Environmental Science at UEA ( http://www.uea.ac.uk/mac/comm/media/press/2009/nov/homepagenews/CRU-update - this includes a direct rebuttal of the single seemingly most-damaging email, the 'trick' email), my University, has been gotten out of all proportion in some of the right-wing media, old and new. I have now read a good number of the 'worst' of the hacked emails. I also know a few of the protagonists personally, and for human-interest value the hacked emails certainly do offer some tidbits. But: When the dust settles, I predict that the climate-deniers will be left holding onto hardly anything, here. There is so far as I can tell at this (still-admittedly-early) stage no significant scientific scandal, and most importantly absolutely no reason to doubt any of the fundamentals of the science of manmade climate change here, just a few unpleasant or silly or (at worst) unwise and bad-practice emails. Scient...