Skip to main content

Green jobs now!

 
 

As the financial and economic crisis deepens, the sharp reminder of other problems, given by the spike in oil prices, has faded as pump prices fall back below £1 a litre.

Governments, in the UK and elsewhere, have clearly shown through their clumsy responses that they fail to understand how to correct the economic downturn in ways that will also end climate damage and prepare for the decline in supplies of oil.

Although the mechanisms of tax, credit, money supply and exchange rates are complex, the job losses and eroded savings distressing, and the sudden demise of household-name businesses worrying, the shape of a solution is simple.

Experts forecast that our Gross National Product will fall about 3% in 2009, which means that 3% plus of the productive capacity of our economy will be unused. 3% of our work force will be unemployed, 3% of machines idle, building sites and shops empty, a waste of resources.

What is needed is to divert that wasted 3% into "investment in the low carbon economy," which is not the dream of a woolly-hatted eco-protester but the sober recommendation of Sir Nicholas Stern in his 2006 Climate Change advice commissioned by HM Treasury. Putting this advice into practice in the face of the financial storms would require political will and bold measures, but not the ones applied in the last few months.

It should be obvious by now that insolvent banks will not readily lend money, and that businesses will not borrow to invest, even at zero interest, if they cannot see a way of making a profit thereby. Equally obvious is that few people will boost the UK economy as a result of a small cut in VAT; prudent folk will spend less and reduce their credit card debts, while foolish folk will spend on electronic consumer goods, boosting the Chinese economy, but not British jobs. Government infrastructure projects will create local jobs, but it is hard to depict accelerated road building as "investing in a low carbon economy !"

Government should instead use our money to employ building workers to improve home insulation and install solar panels, road engineers to construct cycle paths, and car workers to build buses. This, and more investment and jobs along similar lines would restart the economy while reducing dangerous climate change and preparing for the post-oil world to come.

This is what the Green Party believes in -- this is our 'Green New Deal' proposal. This is what Britain badly needs, in 2009...

Green jobs now!

.

__,_._,___

Comments

peruviansun said…
Not sure about the logic of your successive 3%s but I do agree that if the government is to embark on public works programmes the focus should be on the green economy. Gloomy forecasters tell us to expect environmental considerations to slip down the list of priorities in face of more urgent concerns. But you argue convincingly that job creation and investment can and should centre on green projects. 2009 is a fantastic opportunity but will the government use it ?

Popular posts from this blog

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...

Stansted: a reflection

The key question, in relation to protsts like that at Stansted last week, is: which side are you on? Are you on the side of big corporations profiteering from completely unsustainable climate-destructive behaviour? Or are you on the side of people with no vested interests just making a non-violent stand, at considerable cost to their own time and money, for the sake of all our futures? It doesn't seem to me a hard judgement to make... Rupert Read Green Party Councillor, Norwich, and Lead Candidate for Eastern Region for the Greens in the 2009 Euro-elections. DID YOU KNOW: A vote of about 10% across Eastern Region on June 4 2009 would be enough to get me elected to the European Parliament... http://rupertsread.blogspot.com