Skip to main content

Stiglitz on bank nationalisation

 
This is a must-read.
 
This Nobel Laureate, an impressive critic of neoliberal globalisation, is copying what I have been saying on Rupert's Read for months...    ;-)

Comments

Tzadik said…
By stating 'copy' you are implying that he is aware of your blog entries and has conciously made us of the information posted. Funny
peruviansun said…
'Copying' is the wrong word but the sense is clear. Stiglitz is expressing views that Rupert Read has already and repeatedly put forward. Maybe not 'funny' but surely correct.
Rupert said…
Joseph, I was just having a laugh, basically...
Thanks for your defence, peruvianism!
Rupert said…
My ;-) was a bit of a clue...

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...