Skip to main content

My windfall tax on energy companies idea picks up steam!

I was intrigued to see that the Guardian’s front page story yesterday (see also http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/mar/05/oil.mining ) reveals that Drax, British Gas et al are arguing against a windfall tax on their obscene profits, on the grounds that such a tax would allegedly prevent them investing in measures to 'green' their activities. They quote a spokesman for British Gas as saying that such 'green' technologies are very expensive, far more so than burning fossil fuels.
When and how are these corporations going to get the message that not investing in greener technologies will not only literally cost the earth, but will also cost them dear? It seems that the answer to that question is: Only if they are made to pay. In other words: the government must make it expensive to rely on burning fossil fuels. By, for example, levying every year -- and not just this year -- a swingeing tax on any profits made from burning these fast-depleting resources that are polluting our planetary life-support system...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...

Stansted: a reflection

The key question, in relation to protsts like that at Stansted last week, is: which side are you on? Are you on the side of big corporations profiteering from completely unsustainable climate-destructive behaviour? Or are you on the side of people with no vested interests just making a non-violent stand, at considerable cost to their own time and money, for the sake of all our futures? It doesn't seem to me a hard judgement to make... Rupert Read Green Party Councillor, Norwich, and Lead Candidate for Eastern Region for the Greens in the 2009 Euro-elections. DID YOU KNOW: A vote of about 10% across Eastern Region on June 4 2009 would be enough to get me elected to the European Parliament... http://rupertsread.blogspot.com