Skip to main content

HGVs in Newmarket Road bus lane?

I am a member of the Joint Highways Agency Committee of Norwich City
Council. Yesterday morning, it was announced at the Committee meeting that
the implementation of the scheme allowing 'freight consolidation vehicles'
to use the bus-and-bike lane on Newmarket Road will be delayed from March
until May, to allow time to consider the very strong
objections that have been raised against the scheme by cyclists, residents,
the Green Party, the LibDems, and others.
I was delighted, because the Council's consultation on this issue has been
abysmal; this
delay will provide a real opportunity for everyone to make their views
known on it. I urge readers of this blog with strong views on the issue or
personal
experience of cycling on this road to get in touch with the Transport
Officers at County Hall, over the next few weeks.
We in Norwich Green Party believe that there are other better
alternatives available than mixing cyclists and HGVs in narrow bus
lanes. Why not, for instance, incentivise use of the freight
consolidation centre by means of simply banning HGVs which are not
freight consolidation vehicles from using Newmarket Road and other such
roads at peak hours? That would provide a much more significant incentive
for
freight consolidation than would this proposed (ab-)use of the bus-and-bike
lane.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...