Skip to main content

HGVs in Newmarket Road bus lane?

I am a member of the Joint Highways Agency Committee of Norwich City
Council. Yesterday morning, it was announced at the Committee meeting that
the implementation of the scheme allowing 'freight consolidation vehicles'
to use the bus-and-bike lane on Newmarket Road will be delayed from March
until May, to allow time to consider the very strong
objections that have been raised against the scheme by cyclists, residents,
the Green Party, the LibDems, and others.
I was delighted, because the Council's consultation on this issue has been
abysmal; this
delay will provide a real opportunity for everyone to make their views
known on it. I urge readers of this blog with strong views on the issue or
personal
experience of cycling on this road to get in touch with the Transport
Officers at County Hall, over the next few weeks.
We in Norwich Green Party believe that there are other better
alternatives available than mixing cyclists and HGVs in narrow bus
lanes. Why not, for instance, incentivise use of the freight
consolidation centre by means of simply banning HGVs which are not
freight consolidation vehicles from using Newmarket Road and other such
roads at peak hours? That would provide a much more significant incentive
for
freight consolidation than would this proposed (ab-)use of the bus-and-bike
lane.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Reasonable manners, in the blogosphere

Dear readers of Rupert's Read; One thing I am pleased about about this blog is that when we have had debates or disagreements here, they have virtually always been good-tempered. Because the norm out there in the blogosphere is often not like that. Take 'Comment is Free', for example, on the Guardian Unlimited site: the level of debate on CIF is pretty awful, frankly, in terms of civility. It is a very unpleasant place to take part in any debate, generally, unless perhaps (as most commenters do) one hides behind the veil of anonymity (which 'ain't allowed' here). And the truth is, in case any fellow commenters reading this don't realise it, that there are many many people who get put off even reading (let alone posting to) CIF because of the volume of plain nasty comments that they risk getting, when they do. I am slightly singling out CIF here, because I believe that this is actually one of the worst places on the blogosphere in terms of this kind of ...
15 comments
Read more

Medialens under the lens, over Syria and Libya: Becoming the new Dave Sparts?

I have long been an active supporter of Medialens ( http://www.medialens.org/ ). Like many others, I have supported them with money, time, tips, and I have been proud to have done so. For they have done very important groundbreaking work over the years challenging the inanities and distortions of the 'mainstream' media. They have for example written important critiques of mainstream media coverage of dangerous climate change, of Iraq Body Count, of the corporate nature of most of our media, and much more besides. They have held the corporate media to account time and again. They ought to be saluted for all of that. It is therefore with a sense of deep regret (as well as of some foreboding) that I have finally to write to address the ways in which, lately, some of the wheels seem to be coming off their wagon. An early warning sign perhaps was their long-running spat with George Monbiot, over the Rwandan genocide and the terrible atr...
16 comments
Read more