Skip to main content

Free publicity for the Green Party! - Norfolk Blogger hoist by his own petard...

Intriguing post here, over at Norfolk Blogger:

http://norfolkblogger.blogspot.com/2008/03/most-stupid-of-gaffes-giving-green.html

[Do read the original post by Darren Johnson too, which is excellent.]

What I find amusing is that Norfolk Blogger has blown his top at the giving of extra publicity to the Green Party, and, by means of doing so, has of course... given extra publicity to the Green Party!
Nice own goal there, Norfolk Blogger! Thanks!!
:-)

Comments

Anonymous said…
Miaow ... I love a caterwauling good spat.

Thanks for that link, Rupert.
2 April 2008 at 10:51
Anonymous said…
It must be said, that Lib Dems are always good for a laugh though. Viz:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/apr/01/nickclegg.pressandpublishing

Or are they all an April Fool?
2 April 2008 at 10:54
Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

Post a Comment
Read more

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...
2 comments
Read more