Skip to main content

'Quantitative easing' - an important thought:

Here is my excellent green economist colleague Molly Scott Cato, on 'quantitative easing':
 
'In Japan the government sent money created in this way to citizens, who are likely to spend it and stimulate the economy directly. Here the government buys the worthless assets of bankrupt financial institutions. Since UK plc is not in its entirety worth even a fraction of the debts that were incurred during the decade of asset bingeing this is a policy of despair that cannot work and will do nothing to help us avoid the looming Depression.
 
'The Green Party has had a policy of Citizens' Income for about 30 years. This would be an ideal way to put more money into the economy, especially since the poorest would benefit most and are the most likely to spend rather than saving. Money created by the public should be invested for the public good. Other alternatives would be spend the money on building hospitals, school and our rail network.
 
'Let's not be distracted by the bleating about controlling the outrages of overpaid bankers. What we are witnessing in our economy this week is a massive transfer of wealth to those who least deserve it.'
 

Comments

Hi Rupert
I agree, but what is holding CI back is the central objection, based on a misperception of the human condition : "It is a liggers charter" "You cannot give something for nothing". (No? What about the bailouts then?). The effective way around this objection is to introduce it via a Green Wage Subsidy.
http://www.greenhealth.org.uk/GreenWageSubsidy.htm
Exactly what is needed in the present economic situation.

Keep up the good work
Richard
Rupert said…
Agreed 100%, Richard.

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...