Skip to main content

Green Party East of England Euro MP Candidates Protest at Royal Bank of Scotland HQ

Environmentally-damaging activities of RBS must now stop

East of England Green Party candidates for the European elections this June Cllr. Rupert Read and Peter Lynn (1st and 2nd respectively on the Eastern Green Party Euro-list) will be protesting outside the Royal Bank of Scotland HQ at 280 Bishopsgate near Liverpool Street station in London, this Thursday.

The protest is organised by the Climate Rush campaign, a direct action group aiming to pressure the Government and businesses into taking dangerous climate change seriously[1].

Rupert and Peter will descend on the bank’s headquarters at 1 o’clock to lend their voices. They will express their dismay at the £33 billion RBS have received in bail outs so far and the scandalous £16 million pension fund received by failed former RBS boss Sir Fred Goodwin, in the context of the incredible £16 billion worth of loans awarded to the coal industry in just the last two years, which is more than any other British bank.

Cllr. Read, prospective MEP for the East of England, said:

“RBS is the UK’s biggest sponsor of climate change and finances a whole range of environmentally devastating projects from oil extraction from the Canadian tar sands to the Kingsnorth power station. In fact, the carbon footprint of the projects it funds was calculated two years ago to be larger than Scotland’s![2]

“Now that the bank is 60% public owned and has received so many billions of pounds in public money these unacceptable practices must stop. Business should never be able to make huge profits from destroying the world. But to make such profits and wreak such havoc using taxpayers money and with the direct financial support of a Government who professes to be serious about tackling environmental degradation …

“Something has to be done. East Anglia is profoundly vulnerable to sea-level-rise; we are not going to stand idly by and watch while RBS, with government connivance, play a key role in devastating our climate. I urge anyone who feels strongly about this disgraceful situation to write to their MP and let them know - or to join me and Peter in London this Thursday.”

[1] http://www.climaterush.co.uk/

[2] The Beaver, ‘RBS’s shameful involvement with oil and gas must be ended’, 10th Feb 2009. http://thebeaveronline.co.uk/2009/02/rbss-shameful-involvement-with-oil-and-gas-must-be-ended.html

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...