Skip to main content

Vote Green to keep out the BNP in Eastern

There are of course many vital positive reasons to vote Green next June, which you can find detailed in my blog, below [including in the post immediately below]. But there is also an important 'negative' reason, which I haven't yet discussed, and that I want to share with you here...:
Next year's Euro-elections are by proportional representation. Now, the Green Party is Britain's fourth political Party. But it is not only the Green Party that has a real chance at picking up the last seat or so in several of the nation's regions, next June. It cannot be ruled out that the far-right racist Party (the BNP) might also do so in one or two places. Which (us, or the far-right) gets more votes will determine which gets elected. It is as simple as that. The Green Party has at present two seats and is aiming to pick up at least 2 or 3 more, thus at least doubling our numbers in the Euro-Parl. The far right at present has no seats, and is aiming to win its first seats at Brussels, which would be an important advance for it. It must not be allowed to achieve that. A vote for the Green Party next year, in the Euro-elections, will in many parts of the country be the single most effective way of stopping the far right from breaking through into the Euro-Parl. In regions such as here in Eastern Region, to be confident of stopping the racists and neo-fascists, your best bet is to vote Green. If we get 125,000 votes, and the BNP gets 124,999 (it isn't likely that they will get so many -- but it is not by any means beyond the realms of possibility), then you'll see what I mean...
 
...It's your choice...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...