Skip to main content

E.U. May Force MI5 to share Intelligence - Green response

 

I am bloggining today to express my concern over our intelligence services being forced to share intelligence with the USA.

 

There is a feeling in America that they have to be autocratic abroad so they can enjoy more freedoms at home, but following the strangely named Patriot Act, much of the celebrated freedoms and liberties enjoyed by Americans were stripped away. Therefore one has to ask, now more than ever: Is this a state that we can trust with loads of confidential and intimate information?? To ask the question is to answer it.

 

And we know that the intelligence agencies often get it wrong.  When you consider the excesses of the CIA since the 1950s – they planned assassinating Fidel Castro by placing an exploding shell on a beach he frequented, by poisoning a cigar that would kill him if smoked, by spiking him with LSD so he would humiliate himself in public, and by poisoning him so his beard would fall out so he would lose the support of the Cuban public – the term "intelligence agencies" almost seems to be an oxymoron.  And more recently, they of course got it so utterly wrong when they made the case for war in Iraq by saying Saddam had WMDs he could launch against Western targets with no more than 45 minutes warning.

 

Should the UK now share their intelligence with the US?  Should the UK provide sensitive information to the US who would have a monopoly on intelligence, with no obligation for them to share theirs with us?  ...Or is it time for us to keep our intelligence to ourselves, and for us to decide which pieces we send to the US, and which pieces we'll keep to ourselves?   

 

I say the latter. I pledge that, as your MEP, I would fight hard to stop any deal that would see European intelligence routinely sent over to the States.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...