Skip to main content

20mph zones coming to road near you?

Written by SAM WILLIAMS
Norwich Evening News 24
22 February 2008

Plans for a city-wide 20mph speed limit on residential roads have been made a priority for Norwich City Council for the coming year.

Councillors from all four political parties at City Hall unanimously backed the motion, raised as an amendment by Rupert Read, Green party councillor for Wensum ward, at the budget meeting earlier this week.

A feasibility study into the proposals are currently underway and while the findings will not be published until May the move has put the blanket limit as one of the council's key aims for 2008/09.

Mr Read said the lower limit would improve safety and reduce pollution in the city.

He said: “When you have people on safe streets they are far more likely to walk or cycle on those streets. This is a consensual item across the chamber. The vast majority of us have thought for a long time the 20mph limit across the city should be put into place.

“I move that it should be put into place across all residential streets and that this should be a priority for the coming year.”

His comments were backed by the Labour administration.Brian Morrey, executive member for environmental impact and transport, said: “We have always campaigned for 20mph limits in residential areas and the feasibility study is still going on and we are waiting for the results.

“If we don't have to drop anything else that's more important it should be a priority for safety reasons. “In lots of housing estates people don't travel more than 20mph anyway. I don't see any need to travel more than 20mph in residential areas.”

But he said the final decision on speed limits would be made by the Norwich Highways Agency Committee (NHAC) - which is made up of representatives from the city and county councils.

Judith Lubbock, Liberal Democrat councillor for Eaton, and member of NHAC, said changing the limits would also save money by reducing the need for alternative traffic calming measures.

She said: “A 20mph limit will make huge savings because the council will not have to spend huge amounts on other measures like speed humps. One important thing is that it's in this year's service plans.”

Antony Little, leader of the Conservative group and Bowthorpe city councillor, also backed the move but said the lower limit would need to be properly enforced to succeed.

He added: “If it's not enforced it's not going to work so we need more consistent checking. It's important it works in practice and not just on paper.”

Comments

Anonymous said…
That's great news and good that you got cross-party support. Hopefully Lewisham (and potentially all of London) is going the same way soon. Brace yourself for the backlash from the anti-green, anti-cyclist, pro-status quo lobby though, which is already in full swing here:
Evening Standard: http://tinyurl.com/3av6lw
Newsshopper: http://tinyurl.com/3xplz4

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...