Skip to main content

Why I am a Green

I am now back from Green Party Conference. But: Why am I a Green? Why do I have very little hope for any of the 'main three' Parties delivering the needful changes, at this fateful point in history?
The key reason why is that the 'Conservatives', the LibDems and New Labour are all thoroughgoingly committed to neo-liberal economics. This points in the OPPOSITE direction to the changes that are needed. As fast as their manifestos become 'environmentalistic', so their belief in 'making things easier for business', in building roads and airports and coal-fired and nuclear power stations etc. undermines any progress they make elsewhere.
What we need is not environmentalism attached to an agenda which in other respects involves business as usual. What we need is ecologism (See e.g. Andrew Dobson's book, 'Green political thought'. http://www.andrewdobson.com/?page_id=14
http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2465/is_4_30/ai_63699792 ) And, as I bring out in the posts and comments below, we need moreover ecologism across large tranches of the world. 'Ecologism in one country' is pretty hopeless. But that of course doesn't mean (and here I am taking up an issue in the debate around Transition Towns that I have spawned -- see below) that we shouldn't try to make Britain one huge demonstration project -- we _should_.
I am also given hope by the increasingly global nature of the anti-globalisation movement -- and of the Green Party, the closest thing we now have to a truly European and to some extent global political Party...

Comments

weggis said…
Why did you write 'Conservatives' in single quotation marks?
Rupert said…
Because they aren't really Conservatives. They only conserve things if doing so is compatible with endless economic growth. Whereas we Greens ae actually SERIOUS about conservation...
weggis said…
Are you saying that we are the REAL “Conservative” Party?
The sort that fought tooth and nail against the Liberal’s laissez faire policies in days of old, and of whom there are still plenty about.
Rupert said…
Yep, exactly. If one actually wants to conserve things for the future, then it's gotta be Green Green Green all the way.

Popular posts from this blog

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...

Stansted: a reflection

The key question, in relation to protsts like that at Stansted last week, is: which side are you on? Are you on the side of big corporations profiteering from completely unsustainable climate-destructive behaviour? Or are you on the side of people with no vested interests just making a non-violent stand, at considerable cost to their own time and money, for the sake of all our futures? It doesn't seem to me a hard judgement to make... Rupert Read Green Party Councillor, Norwich, and Lead Candidate for Eastern Region for the Greens in the 2009 Euro-elections. DID YOU KNOW: A vote of about 10% across Eastern Region on June 4 2009 would be enough to get me elected to the European Parliament... http://rupertsread.blogspot.com