Skip to main content

UK GHGs up since Kyoto, not down

As readers of Rupert's Read will have been aware for some years, there is a horrible disconnect between the British government's CLAIMS about Britain's carbon emissions, and the dirty reality. See below for more information - from our new Green House report on this:



UK Greenhouse Gas Emissions Actually Rising

Official Figures 'Misleading' Claims green think tank

The British delegation at the Rio Conference will hold their heads up high: the UK, we will be told, has made great strides in reducing its greenhouse gas emissions. Yet analysis from environmental think tank Green House based on government figures demonstrates that this is a misleading claim and that, in reality, UK emissions have been rising.

The official figures will leave two important contributors to greenhouse gas emissions out of the picture:

Emissions from air travel and shipping, that together have doubled since 1990, from 3.2% of total UK emissions to 7.7%; and
Emissions 'embodied' in imports that are produced overseas but consumed in the UK. If they were included we would have seen that our emissions have increased from 1990 to 2006, rather than substantially reducing as official figures suggest.

While there might have been some reduction with the slowing of the economy since 2007, the overall conclusion is that we have been emitting greenhouse gases at a level above what we agreed at Kyoto throughout the whole period since 1990.

This process of exporting, rather than reducing our emissions, not only prevents us from tackling climate change, it also undermines our economy by encouraging the off-shoring of production and jobs. By contrast if we moved to a more locally based economy powered by renewable energy we could achieve a huge transitional boost to the economy in the short term, and massively increase our sustainability in the long term.



The detailed analysis behind these figures can be downloaded from the Green House website at http://www.greenhousethinktank.org/page.php?pageid=gases.

(See n.ii, for acknowledgement of my pathbreaking contribution to this...)

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...