Skip to main content

Worst EU Lobbying Awards 2008 -- Vote now!

Worst EU Lobbying Award 2008Vote Now at www.worstlobby.eu!

The Green Party is proud of our MEPs' absolutely solid record on exposing dubious lobbying practices. I plan to follow in their footsteps. So, we strongly welcome the chance to vote in the '2008 Worst EU Lobbying Awards' – the annual award for deceptive, manipulative or unethical lobbying.

This year you can vote in two categories:

    1.      The 'Worst EU Lobbying' Award for the lobbyist, company or lobby group that in 2008 has employed the most deceptive, misleading, or otherwise problematic lobbying tactics in their attempts to influence EU  decision-making.

    2.      The special 'Worst Conflict of Interest' Award for the MEP, Commissioner or Commission official whose background, side-jobs or other liaisons with special interests raise the most serious concerns about their ability to act in public interest.

Select your winners now in both categories and cast your vote at http://www.worstlobby.eu/2008

The nominees for the 2008 Worst EU Lobbying Award are:
    *    the Agrofuels lobby (MPOC, Unica and Abengoa) – for greenwashing agrofuels;
    *    European Alliance for Access to Safe Medicine – for hiding the involvement of big pharma;
    *    European Business and Parliament Scheme – for EP indoors lobbying;
    *    Gplus and Aspect Consulting – for spreading war propaganda;
    *    the airline lobby IATA – for deceptions to avoid CO2 reduction obligations.

The nominees for the Worst Conflict of Interest Award are:
    *    Dr Caroline Jackson MEP – appointed advisor to a waste company;
    *    Piia-Noora Kauppi MEP – lobbies for her future employer;
    *    Klaus-Heiner Lehne MEP – doubles as a lawyer;
    *    Ex-Commission officials Petite, Klotz and Kjølbye – now lobbying for industry;
    *    DG Trade Director Wenig – slips inside informations to lobbyists.
   
The candidates were selected out of 54 nominations by citizens and groups from around Europe after thorough scrutiny by the organisers. For more background on the individual candidates, check out http://www.worstlobby.eu. The voting website is available in English and German.

Help us expose the worst lobbying in Brussels and cast your vote at at http://www.worstlobby.eu/2008!

Please spread the news about the awards! Tell your friends via our website or put banners on your websites. Banners can be found here: http://www.foeeurope.org/corporates/banner/wla.html

Online voting closes November 30. The winners will be announced at a ceremony in Brussels on December 9. The Worst EU Lobbying Awards are organised by Corporate Europe Observatory, Friends of the Earth Europe, LobbyControl and Spinwatch.

Comments

scott redding said…
That stuff about Dr. Caroline Jackson is interesting, since we need to constantly confront our local Tories over waste.
Chris said…
I voted for Caroline Jackson, Tory MEP. Her support for incineration while working for a waste company is outrageous.

Popular posts from this blog

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...

Stansted: a reflection

The key question, in relation to protsts like that at Stansted last week, is: which side are you on? Are you on the side of big corporations profiteering from completely unsustainable climate-destructive behaviour? Or are you on the side of people with no vested interests just making a non-violent stand, at considerable cost to their own time and money, for the sake of all our futures? It doesn't seem to me a hard judgement to make... Rupert Read Green Party Councillor, Norwich, and Lead Candidate for Eastern Region for the Greens in the 2009 Euro-elections. DID YOU KNOW: A vote of about 10% across Eastern Region on June 4 2009 would be enough to get me elected to the European Parliament... http://rupertsread.blogspot.com