Skip to main content

Game over for Farage?

Will those who voted for UKIP at the local elections last month turn a blind eye to newspaper reports that the leader they've turned to, the "charismatic" Nigel Farage, set up an offshore trust fund?

Perhaps voters at the County Council elections, understandably and rightly fed up with the old Parties, were impressed by UKIP's stance as the 'outsiders' to mainstream politics. Yet, just as the MPs' expenses scandal was beginning to fade in the public consciousness, here is Farage, who'd spoken out against tax-evasion, exposed as a person so keen on feathering his own nest that you have to ask how far removed is his attitude from that of some of those Parliamentary wrongdoers. It sits badly with the Leader of a Party supposedly committed to putting this country first that he sought to avoid paying tax here by taking his money offshore and did so after he'd switched professions from commodities broker to politician.

Mr Farage has shown himself an elitist, amoral, hypocritical tax-avoider. Isn't it now plain to see how he is unlike most ordinary folk who voted for his Party? Without fair taxation our chances of escaping from the austerity quagmire the coalition government has us floundering in will be even worse than they are. 

In fact it's we in the Greens who are the clean and honest alternative to old-style politics, without recourse to personal tax-avoidance schemes among the leadership! Move over, Farage: with this scandal, your reputation is blown and your honeymoon is over.

Comments

Brian Candeland said…
Sadly I suspect most UKIP voters don't care too hoots about Farage's tax arrangements and will continue to lap up his anti-immigrant, anti-EU, anti-wind power views. After all, they haven't been put off by his European Parliament gravy-train riding.
pigreen said…
Brian may well be right - but its well worth revealing his misdeeds and pointing to the clean Green alternatives..

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...