Skip to main content

Guardians event - hosted by GUARDIAN newspaper!

 

Radical 'super jury' proposal to be piloted

 

 

A radical new idea to charge a 'super jury' of ordinary people with powers greater than the House of Lords will be trialled in London on 25th April 2012.  Green House think tank Chair Dr. Rupert Read will demonstrate how his idea for 'Guardians for future generations' would work at a public meeting at King's Place, London: Twelve of those attending the meeting will be picked at random to form a mock-jury to 'decide' on an issue of vital importance to future people…

 

The event follows Dr Read's successful launch of the original 'Guardians for Future Generations' report at the House of Commons in January. The report proposes that a council of randomly-picked members of the public, like a jury, should be placed above the House of Lords to oversee all government decisions. The Guardians' central powers would be a veto over new legislation that threatens the interests of future generations, and a right to force a review of existing legislation that is already damaging their basic needs.

 

 

Notes for Editors:

 

-          The 'super-jury' pilot will take place at a public meeting at 6.00pm [for 6.30] on 25th April 2012, at The Scott Room, The Guardian, Kings Place, 90 York Way, London, N1 9GU. The meeting will be co-hosted by Green House Think Tank and The Guardian newspaper.

-          Rupert Read, Chair of Green House, will headline the meeting along with Polly Higgins and the Hungarian Ombudsman for Future Generations, Sandor Fulop (via Skype). The 'mock-super-jury' session on Ap. 25 is modelled on Polly Higgins's 'mock-ecocide-trial' of last year: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/damian-carrington-blog/2011/sep/29/ecocide-oil-criminal-court

-          Cameras and media welcome to attend.

-          Entrance is free and refreshments (food and drink) will be provided. Members of the public are encouraged to attend; however entry will be on a first-come first-served basis.

-          An insight into online debate sparked by the 'Guardians for Future Generations' launch in January can be viewed here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/damian-carrington-blog/2012/jan/04/climate-politics-future-generation-justice?

-          Further information about Green House think tank can be found at http://www.greenhousethinktank.org.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reasonable manners, in the blogosphere

Dear readers of Rupert's Read; One thing I am pleased about about this blog is that when we have had debates or disagreements here, they have virtually always been good-tempered. Because the norm out there in the blogosphere is often not like that. Take 'Comment is Free', for example, on the Guardian Unlimited site: the level of debate on CIF is pretty awful, frankly, in terms of civility. It is a very unpleasant place to take part in any debate, generally, unless perhaps (as most commenters do) one hides behind the veil of anonymity (which 'ain't allowed' here). And the truth is, in case any fellow commenters reading this don't realise it, that there are many many people who get put off even reading (let alone posting to) CIF because of the volume of plain nasty comments that they risk getting, when they do. I am slightly singling out CIF here, because I believe that this is actually one of the worst places on the blogosphere in terms of this kind of ...

Medialens under the lens, over Syria and Libya: Becoming the new Dave Sparts?

I have long been an active supporter of Medialens ( http://www.medialens.org/ ). Like many others, I have supported them with money, time, tips, and I have been proud to have done so. For they have done very important groundbreaking work over the years challenging the inanities and distortions of the 'mainstream' media. They have for example written important critiques of mainstream media coverage of dangerous climate change, of Iraq Body Count, of the corporate nature of most of our media, and much more besides. They have held the corporate media to account time and again. They ought to be saluted for all of that. It is therefore with a sense of deep regret (as well as of some foreboding) that I have finally to write to address the ways in which, lately, some of the wheels seem to be coming off their wagon. An early warning sign perhaps was their long-running spat with George Monbiot, over the Rwandan genocide and the terrible atr...