Skip to main content

Guardians event - hosted by GUARDIAN newspaper!

 

Radical 'super jury' proposal to be piloted

 

 

A radical new idea to charge a 'super jury' of ordinary people with powers greater than the House of Lords will be trialled in London on 25th April 2012.  Green House think tank Chair Dr. Rupert Read will demonstrate how his idea for 'Guardians for future generations' would work at a public meeting at King's Place, London: Twelve of those attending the meeting will be picked at random to form a mock-jury to 'decide' on an issue of vital importance to future people…

 

The event follows Dr Read's successful launch of the original 'Guardians for Future Generations' report at the House of Commons in January. The report proposes that a council of randomly-picked members of the public, like a jury, should be placed above the House of Lords to oversee all government decisions. The Guardians' central powers would be a veto over new legislation that threatens the interests of future generations, and a right to force a review of existing legislation that is already damaging their basic needs.

 

 

Notes for Editors:

 

-          The 'super-jury' pilot will take place at a public meeting at 6.00pm [for 6.30] on 25th April 2012, at The Scott Room, The Guardian, Kings Place, 90 York Way, London, N1 9GU. The meeting will be co-hosted by Green House Think Tank and The Guardian newspaper.

-          Rupert Read, Chair of Green House, will headline the meeting along with Polly Higgins and the Hungarian Ombudsman for Future Generations, Sandor Fulop (via Skype). The 'mock-super-jury' session on Ap. 25 is modelled on Polly Higgins's 'mock-ecocide-trial' of last year: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/damian-carrington-blog/2011/sep/29/ecocide-oil-criminal-court

-          Cameras and media welcome to attend.

-          Entrance is free and refreshments (food and drink) will be provided. Members of the public are encouraged to attend; however entry will be on a first-come first-served basis.

-          An insight into online debate sparked by the 'Guardians for Future Generations' launch in January can be viewed here: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/damian-carrington-blog/2012/jan/04/climate-politics-future-generation-justice?

-          Further information about Green House think tank can be found at http://www.greenhousethinktank.org.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...