Skip to main content

CHARLES CLARKE: THE GADDAFI CONNECTION

An intriguing and dismaying excerpt from the Guardian's live blog on Libya, concerning our ex-MP here in Norwich Souh and his own closeness to the (now utterly discredited and ousted) Gaddafi regime:   [ http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/middle-east-live/2011/aug/24/libya-rebels-take-gaddafi-compound-live-updates#block-48#block-61 ]

>> 7.05pm: Luke Harding has...surveyed the now derelict residence of Britain's ambassador in Libya, which was trashed and looted in March while Gaddafi's soldiers looked on. Among the debris he found signs of the dubiuously close relationship between the ousted dictator and the UK's former New Labour governments:

"The once-attractive art deco building was today a spectacularly gutted ruin. Fire had completely razed the ground floor; debris covered the sweeping marble staircase. All that was left of Her Majesty's billiard table was a charred frame. Pieces of Minton bone china and the bottom of a Whittard teapot lay next to a ravaged dishwasher.

Osama Mohamad, a marine scientist whose son witnessed the destruction, said that Gaddafi's officials had encouraged locals to destroy and rob the property. Osama said he was disappointed by Britain's close relationship with Gaddafi, and by the invitation to Libya's ambassador – subsequently withdrawn – to attend Prince William's wedding. "Gaddafi's been a dictator for 42 years. I don't accept it. I accept it from Italy but not from Britain," he said. He added: "Tony Blair is an adviser to Gaddafi. It's strange."

There was also a menu from a dinner given in honour of Charles Clarke – a sign of Britain's dubiously warm relations with Tripoli under the last Labour government. Clarke enjoyed spiced pumpkin soup with "pan-friend Dentishi" and "North African lamb with couscous and mixed vegetables." The then Labour minister [was also] served a bottle of Chablis grand cru, as well as coffee and truffles."

_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

BLAIR AND HIS MAIN MINISTERS, SUCH AS CLARKE, HAVE COME OUT OF THIS AFFAIR VERY BADLY...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...