Skip to main content

David Fleming - a great man

I'm still reeling somewhat from the death of my friend David Fleming late last year. Here are a couple of great tributes I've picked up:
I'm pleased that the last time I saw David, in September of 2010, we had a great time together, and some superb chats (as one virtually always did with him). He will be sorely missed, but his influence lives on.

 

Comments

DarkOptimism said…
Me too Rupert, me too. I'm sure you've seen the fantastic coverage of the new TEQs report all over the press, but it's so strange not going for a drink with David to discuss it all..

Details of his memorial service on the 4th February are on that post you've linked to - all welcome.

All the best,
Shaun
Rupert said…
Thanks Shaun!
Sadly I can't make the date. But I am hoping to write an obit for David in GREENWORLD.
THANKS SO MUCH for your lovely words about David, Shaun.

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...