Skip to main content

We are eating into our 'natural capital' - report

What is crucial in this [below] is the link between economy and
ecosystem. This is where the GP's position is distinctive: Our Party
believes in one planet living! Other Parties presumably think that in a
moment or two we'll be off mining in space etc - pure fantasy...
__________________________________________________________________
WWF has launched the 2010 edition of the Living Planet Report
http://nl.panda.org/inxmail?i4710vmfk0e0bdiubqbwqx3a528.

The report is published every 2 years and is considered to be the
world's
leading, science-based analysis about the impact of human activity on
the
health of our planet. This is a big deal for us and we wanted to share
it
with you, our supporter, straight away.

It's key finding: humanity's demands exceed our planet's capacity to
sustain us. That is, we ask for more than what we have.

Why does this happen?

How can we change this and guarantee a healthy future for human kind?

You'll find some answers below:

== Learn ==
- How does the loss of species diversity affect you and me?
http://nl.panda.org/inxmail?i4710vknk0e0bdiubqbk2d3a528

- Learn more about how key species populations have faired since 1970.
http://nl.panda.org/inxmail?i4710vkrk0e0bdiubq03gv3a528

- Why do temperate species do better than tropical species?
http://nl.panda.org/inxmail?i4710vkvk0e0bdiubq0lpe3a528

- Who comes of worse? Terrestrial or Freshwater animals?
http://nl.panda.org/inxmail?i4710vkzk0e0bdiubqb3vx3a528

- Which countries makes the most demands on our planet, and which the
least? http://nl.panda.org/inxmail?i4710vk5k0e0bdiubqbl4g3a528

- How is this related to what we earn?
http://nl.panda.org/inxmail?i4710vlbk0e0bdiubq0ye23a528

- And how "developed" we are?
http://nl.panda.org/inxmail?i4710vlfk0e0bdiubq0inl3a528

== Explore ==

-- Find your country and see how it compares to other countries.
http://nl.panda.org/inxmail?i4710vljk0e0bdiubqbyxy3a528

-- See what makes up the biggest components of our footprints.
http://nl.panda.org/inxmail?i4710vlnk0e0bdiubqbi6j3a528

-- Watch how the index for species populations move and change over
time.
http://nl.panda.org/inxmail?i4710vlrk0e0bdiubq0zc73a528


Download the Living Planet Report here
http://nl.panda.org/inxmail/d.pdf?i4710v7jjqe0bdiubq0c2e3a528
--
Rupert Read
Green Party Councillor, Norwich.
http://rupertread.net
[If you have an urgent email for me while I am away from a regular computer, you may wish to try contacting me instead on rupertread+mob AT gmail.com]

WHY NOT FOLLOW ME ON TWITTER?: twitter.com/GreenRupertRead

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...