Skip to main content

GREENS WILL USE INFLUENCE IN NORWICH TO PUSH FOR OPENNESS


If you are not sure why this issue matters, then let me mention one word: Connaught. Yep: we need to improve the way Council decisions are scrutinised, alright...
 
GREENS PUSH FOR OPENNESS AT CITY COUNCIL

Green Party city councillors are pushing for an "open and transparent council" ahead of the first full council meeting on Tuesday.

Greens said today that they will be using their increased influence following the elections earlier this month to press for a transformation in the way that the council is run. Prior to the recent local elections, Greens in Norwich published a manifesto which called for an "open council" and includes subjecting more decisions to the scrutiny process, doing work to allow service contracts to be brought back in house and publishing timetables of work (like housing repairs) online.

Following the September elections, the Green Party remains the main opposition to Labour on Norwich city Council and Green councillors have not lost their zeal to make the council more accountable.The Green Party increased the number of city councillors it has in Norwich at the local elections earlier this month, while the number of Liberal Democrat and Conservative councillors went down [1].

Claire Stephenson, the re-elected leader of the Green group on the city council said:

"The Green Party manifesto this year focused on making the council more open to scrutiny and more effective at meeting residents' needs. With an increased number of councillors we will be pushing hard to try and bring about the Green changes that so many Norwich residents voted for."

One idea Green councillors want to see put into practice is to create a disclosure log, published online, that would list the Freedom of Information requests received by the council and the responses given. Claire Stephenson said:

"Green councillors want to inspire a new culture of increased openness at city hall. Our local election manifesto included a whole range of ideas from improving the way decisions are scrutinised to publishing more information about the council and its activities. All of this should increase the accountability of council decisions as well as making the council more effective. We will be using our position as the second largest party in a council with no overall control to bring in as many of these changes as possible."

Green councillors would also like to see the council introducing carbon budgeting, increasing the number of allotments to meet demand and lobbying central government against the cuts to local authority budgets.
 
Notes:

[1] The Green Party increased their number of city councillors to form the largest ever group of Green Party councillors anywhere in the country. They strengthened their position as the main opposition, with no party in overall control.

Comments

alastaira said…
Have you considered recording and publishing videos of council meetings online? You can't get much more "open" than exposing the actual discussions of the council on youtube...
Cllr Kitcat has already pioneered this in BrightonP - sure, you're hardly going to top the "most watched" video poll, but if the technology's there and it's easy and cheap to use, why not exploit it? Also, show some solidarity with him in the face of the ridiculous legal action being taken against him http://www.jasonkitcat.com/2010/09/update-youtube-case-tory-minister-backs-me/

Also, it will be interesting come next election time when the various candidates try to claim credit for "tirelessly campaigning to push ideas through council" - then we'll be able to prove who's been telling porky pies!
Rupert said…
Thanks. Yes, we put a motion through the Council a few years ago calling for precisely this. Sadly, the money has never been found to implement it...
That is one reason why we are now focussing on ways of opening up the Council to public scrutiny that are even cheaper.

Popular posts from this blog

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...

Stansted: a reflection

The key question, in relation to protsts like that at Stansted last week, is: which side are you on? Are you on the side of big corporations profiteering from completely unsustainable climate-destructive behaviour? Or are you on the side of people with no vested interests just making a non-violent stand, at considerable cost to their own time and money, for the sake of all our futures? It doesn't seem to me a hard judgement to make... Rupert Read Green Party Councillor, Norwich, and Lead Candidate for Eastern Region for the Greens in the 2009 Euro-elections. DID YOU KNOW: A vote of about 10% across Eastern Region on June 4 2009 would be enough to get me elected to the European Parliament... http://rupertsread.blogspot.com