Skip to main content

BEYOND THE _TRACTATUS_ WARS - Information about my next edited book, a sequel to THE NEW WITTGENSTEIN

Over fifteen years have passed since Cora
Diamond and James Conant turned Wittgenstein
scholarship upside down with the program of
'resolute' reading, and ten years since this reading was
crystallized in the major collection, The New Wittgenstein,
also with Routledge. This approach remains at the
center of the debate about Wittgenstein and his
philosophy, and this book draws together the latest
thinking of the world's leading Tractatarian
scholars and promising newcomers. Showcasing
one piece alternately from each 'camp', Beyond
The Tractatus Wars pairs newly commissioned pieces addressing
differing views on how to understand early
Wittgenstein, providing for the first time an arena
in which the debate between 'strong' resolutists,
'mild' resolutists and 'elucidatory' readers of the book can really take
place. The book includes famous 'samizdat' essays by
 Warren Goldfarb and Roger White that are finally seeing the light of day.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Reasonable manners, in the blogosphere

Dear readers of Rupert's Read; One thing I am pleased about about this blog is that when we have had debates or disagreements here, they have virtually always been good-tempered. Because the norm out there in the blogosphere is often not like that. Take 'Comment is Free', for example, on the Guardian Unlimited site: the level of debate on CIF is pretty awful, frankly, in terms of civility. It is a very unpleasant place to take part in any debate, generally, unless perhaps (as most commenters do) one hides behind the veil of anonymity (which 'ain't allowed' here). And the truth is, in case any fellow commenters reading this don't realise it, that there are many many people who get put off even reading (let alone posting to) CIF because of the volume of plain nasty comments that they risk getting, when they do. I am slightly singling out CIF here, because I believe that this is actually one of the worst places on the blogosphere in terms of this kind of ...

Medialens under the lens, over Syria and Libya: Becoming the new Dave Sparts?

I have long been an active supporter of Medialens ( http://www.medialens.org/ ). Like many others, I have supported them with money, time, tips, and I have been proud to have done so. For they have done very important groundbreaking work over the years challenging the inanities and distortions of the 'mainstream' media. They have for example written important critiques of mainstream media coverage of dangerous climate change, of Iraq Body Count, of the corporate nature of most of our media, and much more besides. They have held the corporate media to account time and again. They ought to be saluted for all of that. It is therefore with a sense of deep regret (as well as of some foreboding) that I have finally to write to address the ways in which, lately, some of the wheels seem to be coming off their wagon. An early warning sign perhaps was their long-running spat with George Monbiot, over the Rwandan genocide and the terrible atr...