Skip to main content

Regional Transport will up CO2 emissions dangerously in the East

For Rupert's Readers, from the good people at Transition Norwich:
 


EEDA has just published an important study – the first of its kind in the UK called East of England Transport and Carbon Study: Assessing transport's contribution to a low carbon economy in the East of England. The study was undertaken by Atkins in collaboration with the University of Aberdeen. The findings ought to ring alarm bells and if taken seriously by decision makers, should lead to a radical reassessment of regional transport policies.
 
 The main findings are:

·   In 2007 road transport emissions in the East of England accounted for almost 33 per cent of local CO2 emissions

·  under Business as Usual, (planned growth in population etc), the region's transport sector CO2 emissions will grow a further 33% between 2006 and 2031 if no other action is taken.  
 
This huge growth goes in completely the opposite direction of what is required. The Climate Change Act 2008 sets a legally binding target of at least an 80% cut in greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 (on 1990 levels).  EEDA's Regional Economic Strategy commits the East of England to reducing emissions by 60% across all sectors by 2031.  
 
The study assessed three carbon reduction scenarios. Even under a radical Scenario 3 "The national and regional shift", (includes pricing, strong investment in behavioural change, walking, cycling and public transport infrastructure and changes to land use planning practices), emissions would only fall by 27% on 2006 levels. This would take the region's transport sector emissions back to below 1990 levels, but it wouldn't achieve a 60% cut on 1990 levels. Other sectors would have to take a bigger cut.      
 
Please take the time to read http://www.eeda.org.uk/files/TRACS_Executive_Summary.pdf  circulate to colleagues.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...
2 comments
Read more

Stansted: a reflection

The key question, in relation to protsts like that at Stansted last week, is: which side are you on? Are you on the side of big corporations profiteering from completely unsustainable climate-destructive behaviour? Or are you on the side of people with no vested interests just making a non-violent stand, at considerable cost to their own time and money, for the sake of all our futures? It doesn't seem to me a hard judgement to make... Rupert Read Green Party Councillor, Norwich, and Lead Candidate for Eastern Region for the Greens in the 2009 Euro-elections. DID YOU KNOW: A vote of about 10% across Eastern Region on June 4 2009 would be enough to get me elected to the European Parliament... http://rupertsread.blogspot.com
2 comments
Read more