Skip to main content

The Green Party Will Stand Against David Davis

After much internal democratic deliberation, my Party, the Green Party, has decided to stand against the Tories in the Haltemprice and Howden byelection.

Our candidate is Shan Oakes, a local campaigner and local TV personality. Her – our -- central argument will be that Davis offers only the shadow of freedom: we offer the substance. And in particular, that it is ludicrous to posture as a defender of freedom – of habeas corpus -- while being quite happy to throw people into jail for 28 days without charge. In no other European country is this level of infringement upon liberty tolerated.

In other words: we are throwing down the gauntlet to Davis on the very issue that he decided to fight on. I am grateful to Davis for giving the country the chance for this much needed debate over civil liberties: I express my gratitude at Our Kingdom. But what is happening now is that we are entering that debate properly, and outflanking Davis, arguing that his vision of [civil] liberties is in a whole slew of ways not radical (not progressive, not serious) enough.
We are the true defenders of civil liberties: if people truly believe
in / get convinced by what Davis called the byelection for, then they should vote for us, not him.

And then there are broader issues of freedom that should be at play here, too: for example, the freedom that is afforded by social ownership of key services, as opposed to neo-liberal privatisation. George Lakoff makes this argument well, about how we must not in the first place allow the argument to be portrayed as one of freedom vs. constraint: We are the true advocates of freedom, and not Davis.

Those who are prepared to sacrifice a lot of freedom for a little alleged security deserve – and will get – neither freedom nor security. The Green Party is taking this argument to David Davis’s doorstep. Expect to see our Party’s major figures – including Peter Tatchell, Party Principal Speaker Derek Wall, Total Politics patron Caroline Lucas MEP and Jean Lambert MEP -- visiting the constituency. I hope to spend some time there, too.

Anyone who has spent time recently on ‘LibDem Voice’ will know full-well that many Libdem activists are furious that they are not being allowed to stand against Davis, and question the degree of his commitment to the issues that are supposedly central to what he is doing, in fighting this byelection. And some of them have already remarked there on their blog that this leaves the door open for us to take the fight to Haltemprice and Howden. Indeed so: that is exactly what we’ll now be doing...

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...