Skip to main content

Green Party inaugural Leadership elections coming...

Several months back, this blog engaged in speculation about who might stand for the Leadership of the Green Party, if the referendum creating Leader and Deputy posts went through. Well, it did go through, and we are about to see if any of those speculations (or suggestions) were accurate or not: for nominations are about to open for the first-ever election for Leader and Deputy Leader of our Party...
Who WILL stand?
Then, as now, I hope that Caroline Lucas will stand for Leader and win. Though I also hope that there will be a contest for the post. And I'm going to say one thing new: I hope that my colleague, now the first-ever Leader of the Opposition on a Principal Authority Council, Adrian Ramsay, will stand for Deputy. I think it would be really exciting to have someone fresh and new, someone standing for the second most winnable Parliamentary seat for our Party (with Brighton Pavillion, where Caroline is standing, being the most winnable), putting themselves up for this national office...

Comments

Jim Jepps said…
Rupert, are we reading a barely concealed "scoop"? Is Adrian throwing his hat in the ring?
Paul said…
This is an immediate reaction to this post...

Surely Adrian has got enough on his hands with being the 'Leader' of the Green opposition group @ Norwich and he his potentially as serious a candidate as those of other parties to challenge Charles Clark.

He needs to concentrate on those!
Rupert said…
This is _not_ a scoop!
BUT: I do know that Adrian is seriously _thinking_ about throwing his hat into the ring.

Now, it is true that Adrian already has a lot on his plate. But the same is true of any other viable / serious potential candidate (of whom there are only a few). Sadly, as usual, it is the people who are busiest who are most likely to be called upon to do more top-qual jobs. They are busiest, BECAUSE they are very good...
If Adrian were to stand, I believe that Norwich folk would back him and pull behind him in terms of doing extra work to make it possible for him to do this vitally-important job too. That is certainly what activists around here are saying to me.
Jim Jepps said…
Scoop or no you've sparked something off here, now Jim Killock is running a poll on who should run...

Jim's blog
weggis said…
Not interested yourself then, Rupert?
Rupert said…
Yes, here is Jim K.'s post, which is WELL worth looking at:
http://jim.killock.org.uk/?p=33
Thanks, Weggis; no, I am definitely _not_ going to be a candidate. I have plenty on my plate already, as a University Lecturer, busy ward Councillor, and Euro lead-candidate. Plus, I wouldn't stand against Adrian (who, I note, is polling very well in Jim Killock's poll!).
If I make MEP, then in a few years' time it might be something I'd consider.
Jim Killock said…
I’m running a poll about who should be leader and deputy.
Glenn Vowles said…
I'm for a Caroline Lucas/Adrian Ramsay leadership/deputy leadership. Makes eminent sense and they are both great leaders!!

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...