Skip to main content

A Norwich Conservative Councillor speaks

Here's a real beauty, from Cllr. Eve Collishaw (Con.), at yesterday's Joint Highways Agency Committee meeting, on which I also sit:

"The public never understand transport schemes."

And another, a few minutes later, to 'explain' what she meant:

"If you have public meetings about transport schemes, you'll just waste a load of time and money, and it is nothing to do with democracy: Officers understand these schemes, ordinary people just don't."

How charmingly frank!

If this is representative of the level of 'respect' which Norwich Tory Councillors have for the intelligence of their voters, then perhaps those voters will particularly enjoy the chance to be equally 'frank' with Norwich's Conservatives, when democratically voting, this May 1st...

Comments

Antony said…
Didn't the people speak about Cllr Eve Collishaw last May, Rupert, when she held what was considered to be an otherwise safe Labour ward with a big swing and a decent majority?
Rupert said…
Yes -- but that was before this horrendous remark! R
Antony said…
Why have you removed my comment? Democacy at work, Rupert?
Rupert said…
I removed your comment, Antony, because it was misleading to readers. I can take rational criticism, but am not prepared to see falsehoods on this blog.
Best, R.
Anonymous said…
Surely you don't still believe that we live in a democracy, do you Rupert?

The so-called democracy is nothing better than a sham. Most people know this, which is why turnout in "elections" is getting lower and lower.

One blogger exposing the shameful details is The Bristol Blogger. And a recent example of the fakery we endure under the rubric of public CONsultation is this;

http://thebristolblogger.wordpress.com/2008/01/15/fw-council-to-flog-off-200m-of-our-park-land/

Sadly there's plenty more where this came from.

What we have now is not democracy but a sophisticated and insidious form of dictatorship.

How long the British people will put up with this before taking action, is a big question.

Popular posts from this blog

Post-Growth: A new vision for a fairer and more sustainable Britain

More on why 20's plenty -- without need for any further 'trials'...

There are a number of reasons for setting a default speed of 20mph throughout the 'unclassified' road network in residential parts of a city such as Norwich. Most important perhaps is that of driver recognition as to what the speed limit is. If you have 20 mph as the default then you not only establish this limit clearly, but you also adjust the driver's recognition as to what is the "normal" speed in such residential areas. The most important aspect is that drivers set 20 mph as the norm with those 30 mph areas or roads being seen as 50% faster, rather than seeing 30 mph as the norm with 20 mph as 33% slower. The psychological adjustment of normal speeds in residential areas is key to the success of reducing speeds and therefore danger to pedestrians and cyclists. Therefore any trial, pilot or whatever, that only implements 20 mph in a tiny proportion of the city is not modelling 20's Plenty in any realistic manner.   When considering the val...