Skip to main content

Transcript: Jeremy Paxman asks Clegg where the £20bn of cuts will come from

If you missed Paxman's mince-meating of Clegg the other night, that I blogged on at the time, then here for added fun is the transcript...:

BBC Newsnight, Monday 15th September

 

JP        Where are you going to save the £20bn?

NC        Well, some of the savings we have already identified. For instance above average income families should not be part of the tax credit system, that would save around £3bn. We've said that the Child Trust Fund that gives a few hundred quid to 18 year olds is money not well spent when it is younger children that need help more. That would save about half a billion.

JP        You've already committed that to be spent on more teachers haven't you? That's a previous commitment.

NC        No, no, no, the £20bn, let me be quite clear about this, will go towards some of our spending priorities, towards the elderly, housing and teaching.  What we've said today is that the money left over won't simply be handed back to Whitehall, it will be handed back to lower and middle income families who have paid much more tax as part of their overall income than the wealthy.

JP        We've so far checked £3.5bn of the £20bn you are going to save.

NC        There are, there are, there are other items too. The road building programmes, that's almost a billion. We are looking at some defence contracts which we think aren't worthwhile. The Government wants to spend about £13bn on the NHS IT Project. I'll be announcing on Wednesday other items.

JP        You chose the figure of £20bn

NC        Correct

JP        So far we've been able to identify about £4.5bn, £5bn, £5.5bn on things you can save money on, where is the rest?

NC        Well, I'm not able to tell you the rest, because, firstly if they were a good idea the other parties would nick it and secondly, because how spending is allocated by government and therefore how we think we can save, is something we can only decide on finally at the time of the next general election. What we are committing ourselves to as a party now is that £20bn, 3% of the total government expenditure of over £600bn will be identified, it will then be reallocated, redirected to our spending priorities, on the elderly, on the young, on housing and the remainder will be handed back in tax cuts to people who need a break at a time of real economic hardship.

JP        Is it true you plan to save some of the £20bn by shutting down one government department?

NC        Yes, we think that the former DTI government, DBERR as its acronym is called, is not doing a job that really justifies a whole department. That would save us about a billion pounds.

JP        So that would be a billion pounds, and you've factored into that redundancy payments and the rest of it have you?

NC        Errrrr, we would probably need to look at the figures in a little more detail when it comes to the next general election, when we know exactly what the payroll of DBERR is then, but the rough figure is about a billion.

 JP       And Vince Cable's idea that all senior civil servants earning more than £100k a year should have to reapply for their jobs, how many civil servants is it please?

NC        I don't know. That of course is an illustration that Vince gave today about the extent to which large amounts of money are being spent to pay people very considerable amounts of money, and we don't really know if that is money well spent.

JP        We are still a long way off finding £20bn aren't we?

NC        Well, Jeremy, errrr, of course. I'm not going to present to you now on Newsnight a shopping list of what would be the £20bn.

JP        Well why not? You've given us the headline grabbing figure of £20bn, why can't you give us the proper details?

Comments

scott redding said…
It was a slow-motion car crash to watch.

Prophetically, Clegg was right about other parties stealing his ideas.

Bernard Donoughue, a former adviser to Wilson and Callaghan, is already saying Brown should take four million people out of the tax net before the next election.

"It should be announced at conference and then he should hold a series of public expenditure cuts on the first day back. He should slash redevelopment agencies and the health and safety agency. This would save £20bn. In 1976 Callaghan gave a figure to ministers and told them to go and find it. They did."
Emily Ryall said…
I am so disappointed that the Lib Dems sold out to popularism by voting for Nick Clegg as leader... it's seriously making me consider my membership...

Popular posts from this blog

Reasonable manners, in the blogosphere

Dear readers of Rupert's Read; One thing I am pleased about about this blog is that when we have had debates or disagreements here, they have virtually always been good-tempered. Because the norm out there in the blogosphere is often not like that. Take 'Comment is Free', for example, on the Guardian Unlimited site: the level of debate on CIF is pretty awful, frankly, in terms of civility. It is a very unpleasant place to take part in any debate, generally, unless perhaps (as most commenters do) one hides behind the veil of anonymity (which 'ain't allowed' here). And the truth is, in case any fellow commenters reading this don't realise it, that there are many many people who get put off even reading (let alone posting to) CIF because of the volume of plain nasty comments that they risk getting, when they do. I am slightly singling out CIF here, because I believe that this is actually one of the worst places on the blogosphere in terms of this kind of ...

Medialens under the lens, over Syria and Libya: Becoming the new Dave Sparts?

I have long been an active supporter of Medialens ( http://www.medialens.org/ ). Like many others, I have supported them with money, time, tips, and I have been proud to have done so. For they have done very important groundbreaking work over the years challenging the inanities and distortions of the 'mainstream' media. They have for example written important critiques of mainstream media coverage of dangerous climate change, of Iraq Body Count, of the corporate nature of most of our media, and much more besides. They have held the corporate media to account time and again. They ought to be saluted for all of that. It is therefore with a sense of deep regret (as well as of some foreboding) that I have finally to write to address the ways in which, lately, some of the wheels seem to be coming off their wagon. An early warning sign perhaps was their long-running spat with George Monbiot, over the Rwandan genocide and the terrible atr...