Wednesday, 7 October 2020

Fwd: Climate mitigation research - new methods





Rupert Read

Keep up-to-date with my work by following me on FacebookTwitterInstagram and Youtube. You can also signup to my mailing list and visit my website to find out more about what I do.

I typically respond to emails once a day, call if urgent.
If you require an urgent response to something, then why not try phoning (preferably, by landline: 01603 219294) or SMS-ing me ((if you have my mobile phone number / WhatsApp)).  Thanks.

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Sharma, Rajesh" <rajesh.sharma.19@ucl.ac.uk>
Date: 7 October 2020 at 11:16:13 BST
To: "Rupert Read (PPL - Staff)" <R.Read@uea.ac.uk>
Cc: Ra Sharma <tyburngate@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Climate mitigation research - new methods

Hello – I'm not sure of the academic standard; it may help your insomnia. I am 60 yrs old and have been a senior international financial assets manager, investment banker, infrastructure engineer and policy regulator, so I have previously gained a variety of degrees and professional qualifications; my reason for taking the MSc (dauntingly raising the average age by 4 decades single-handedly) was specifically to learn about climate strategies.

 

Please let me know your thoughts

 

All best

Ra Sharma

 

 

 

From: Rupert Read (PPL - Staff) <R.Read@uea.ac.uk>
Sent: 07 October 2020 10:18
To: Sharma, Rajesh <rajesh.sharma.19@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Climate mitigation research - new methods

 

pse send it me



On 6 Oct 2020, at 17:03, Sharma, Rajesh <rajesh.sharma.19@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:

 

Warning: This email is from outside the UEA system. Do not click on links or attachments unless you expect them from the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Rupert,

 

Apologies for unsolicited comms. I have just completed research at UCL into climate mitigation action, under novel analyses employing infrastructure engineering methods and industry leaders.

 

Its findings are very bleak for different reasons than in conventional narratives. It shows, weakness in social science, IPCC methodology errors, and why climate activism in current form will fail

 

My background is international engineering, financial markets trading & regulation, so this was more for my children's generation than mine!

 

I'm not seeking any return for it. Its framework is very different to mainstream thinking, and identifies action paths that meet objections & hurdles – climate sceptics, economic, tech, socio-ethical – so I would hope reading it may be of interest to you. 

 

I have a lot of respect for your efforts and activism, and would like to contribute. It was very disappointing for me to find failures in all climate action drivers.

 

Please do let me know if you think it might interest you.

 

All best

Ra Sharma

 

0 Comments:

Post a comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

<< Home

1. 2. 3. Rupert's Read: Fwd: Climate mitigation research - new methods 4. 12. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 23. 24.

25. 26. Fwd: Climate mitigation research - new methods 27. 28.

29.




Rupert Read

Keep up-to-date with my work by following me on FacebookTwitterInstagram and Youtube. You can also signup to my mailing list and visit my website to find out more about what I do.

I typically respond to emails once a day, call if urgent.
If you require an urgent response to something, then why not try phoning (preferably, by landline: 01603 219294) or SMS-ing me ((if you have my mobile phone number / WhatsApp)).  Thanks.

Begin forwarded message:

From: "Sharma, Rajesh" <rajesh.sharma.19@ucl.ac.uk>
Date: 7 October 2020 at 11:16:13 BST
To: "Rupert Read (PPL - Staff)" <R.Read@uea.ac.uk>
Cc: Ra Sharma <tyburngate@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: Climate mitigation research - new methods

Hello – I'm not sure of the academic standard; it may help your insomnia. I am 60 yrs old and have been a senior international financial assets manager, investment banker, infrastructure engineer and policy regulator, so I have previously gained a variety of degrees and professional qualifications; my reason for taking the MSc (dauntingly raising the average age by 4 decades single-handedly) was specifically to learn about climate strategies.

 

Please let me know your thoughts

 

All best

Ra Sharma

 

 

 

From: Rupert Read (PPL - Staff) <R.Read@uea.ac.uk>
Sent: 07 October 2020 10:18
To: Sharma, Rajesh <rajesh.sharma.19@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Climate mitigation research - new methods

 

pse send it me



On 6 Oct 2020, at 17:03, Sharma, Rajesh <rajesh.sharma.19@ucl.ac.uk> wrote:

 

Warning: This email is from outside the UEA system. Do not click on links or attachments unless you expect them from the sender and know the content is safe.

Dear Rupert,

 

Apologies for unsolicited comms. I have just completed research at UCL into climate mitigation action, under novel analyses employing infrastructure engineering methods and industry leaders.

 

Its findings are very bleak for different reasons than in conventional narratives. It shows, weakness in social science, IPCC methodology errors, and why climate activism in current form will fail

 

My background is international engineering, financial markets trading & regulation, so this was more for my children's generation than mine!

 

I'm not seeking any return for it. Its framework is very different to mainstream thinking, and identifies action paths that meet objections & hurdles – climate sceptics, economic, tech, socio-ethical – so I would hope reading it may be of interest to you. 

 

I have a lot of respect for your efforts and activism, and would like to contribute. It was very disappointing for me to find failures in all climate action drivers.

 

Please do let me know if you think it might interest you.

 

All best

Ra Sharma

 

30. 31. 32.