Friday, 31 October 2008

Barclays, and bank nationalisation

Barclays bosses are paying 16% interest to Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds to hang onto their bonuses - disgraceful high-risk behaviour (high-risk, because it may commit them to unrepayable debt) strengthening the case for nationalising the banks, as this blog has consistently argued for some time now. Why should Barclays customers -- and the banking system that we all depend on, and that could hardly take another bank tottering -- have to put up with this kind of high-risk profiteering?
 

1 Comments:

Blogger Lynda said...

I really have gone off the idea of our money being involved with overseas banks after the Icelandic failures!

Fortunately, I hopefully do not use a capitalist bank (I use the Co-op Bank which seems a bit safer and more ethical than some of the others). I strongly dislike the idea of fat cats with their massive bonuses on top of huge salaries - espeically when redundancies and remaining overstressed staff occur - to give customers an inferior service.

9 November 2008 at 00:09  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

1. 2. 3. Rupert's Read: Barclays, and bank nationalisation 4. 12. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 23. 24.

25. 26. Barclays, and bank nationalisation 27. 28.

29.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/business/2008/oct/31/barclay-sovereignwealthfunds
Barclays bosses are paying 16% interest to Middle Eastern sovereign wealth funds to hang onto their bonuses - disgraceful high-risk behaviour (high-risk, because it may commit them to unrepayable debt) strengthening the case for nationalising the banks, as this blog has consistently argued for some time now. Why should Barclays customers -- and the banking system that we all depend on, and that could hardly take another bank tottering -- have to put up with this kind of high-risk profiteering?
 
30. 31. 32.