Wednesday, 24 September 2008

New Dredging Threat to our Coastline: Green Party fights back!

 
Newly formed  AODA, the Anglian Offshore Dredging Association consisting of CEMEX UK Marine, Hanson Aggregates Marine, United Marine Dredging, Volker Dredging Ltd. and Sea Aggregates Ltd are considering a new set of dredging areas off our East Anglian coast.

A further large extension (Area 495B) is being sought offshore between Gt. Yarmouth and Lowestoft, to the east of the existing dredging area, and also another new area (Area 496) some ten times that area already being dredged at the existing site off Southwold. 
The near edge of this Area 496 is to the west of the existing dredging ground, less than half the distance from the shoreline as the existing dredge site.

AODA is holding a 'Public Information Day' on this issue at the Vice Admiral Bar at Great Yarmouth Racecourse THIS FRIDAY, open from 2.00 pm with three 15 to 20 minute presentation sessions to commence at 3 pm, 5 pm and 7 pm. I will be there from 3pm onwards, to ask tough questions of the dredgers. So will Pat Gowen of the independent coastal research and protection group, MARINET, and probably (as happened last time) a large number of ordinary citizens and coastal campaigners.

In Holland, the world experts on coastline protection have a ban on dredging for aggregates closer than 25km to the shore. Yet here in England, we allow dredging to take place way closer than that. If this application is granted, it will be criminally irresponsible, at a time when manmade climate change is threatening in any case to raise sea levels and is already worsening winter storms.
I intend on Friday to ask a set of awkward questions of the dredgers; if they cannot adequately reply, then they owe it to the people of East Anglia to withdraw their application and take a more sensible, precautionary approach, rather than wading in and ruining our fragile coastline forever.
 
n.b. There is a useful briefing at http://www.marinet.org.uk/mad/madbrief.html 

3 Comments:

Blogger DocRichard said...

Hi Rupert
It is absolutely unbelievably stupid that they should be even thinking of dredging anywhere near an already eroding coastline. The trouble is, offshore dredgers are in a state of institutionalised denialism, if Hall Sands in Devon is anything to go by. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hall_Sands

What Norfolk needs is to take the energy out of the waves that grind away at its beaches 24/7. All wave energy technology does this to some extent. There are immersed sea wall designs that would be ideal. I am still researching.

24 September 2008 at 23:23  
Blogger Rupert said...

Thnks, Richard! Please keep readers of this blog informed of your important researches! I am right with you on this one.

30 September 2008 at 09:02  
Blogger Susan said...

I am by no means a scientist but surely if they continue to dredge off the East Anglian coast they will be making the sea deeper which makes larger waves which will increase the erosion of the sands. Why cannot someone in parliament stop this. It is no good hiring people who work in line with the government to do reports that there is no evidence that this causes erosion. BUT what evidence can they show that it does not! Dig a hole on the beach and remove the sand and the surrounding sand moves into it THAT IS WHAT IS HAPPENING ON OUR COAST. STOP IT AND STOP IT NOW. Or, alternatively make the dredging companies compensate, in full, everyone who loses their homes because of the erosion of the coast.

27 September 2009 at 12:45  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home

1. 2. 3. Rupert's Read: New Dredging Threat to our Coastline: Green Party fights back! 4. 12. 15. 16. 17. 18. 19. 20. 23. 24.

25. 26. New Dredging Threat to our Coastline: Green Party fights back! 27. 28.

29.
 
Newly formed  AODA, the Anglian Offshore Dredging Association consisting of CEMEX UK Marine, Hanson Aggregates Marine, United Marine Dredging, Volker Dredging Ltd. and Sea Aggregates Ltd are considering a new set of dredging areas off our East Anglian coast.

A further large extension (Area 495B) is being sought offshore between Gt. Yarmouth and Lowestoft, to the east of the existing dredging area, and also another new area (Area 496) some ten times that area already being dredged at the existing site off Southwold. 
The near edge of this Area 496 is to the west of the existing dredging ground, less than half the distance from the shoreline as the existing dredge site.

AODA is holding a 'Public Information Day' on this issue at the Vice Admiral Bar at Great Yarmouth Racecourse THIS FRIDAY, open from 2.00 pm with three 15 to 20 minute presentation sessions to commence at 3 pm, 5 pm and 7 pm. I will be there from 3pm onwards, to ask tough questions of the dredgers. So will Pat Gowen of the independent coastal research and protection group, MARINET, and probably (as happened last time) a large number of ordinary citizens and coastal campaigners.

In Holland, the world experts on coastline protection have a ban on dredging for aggregates closer than 25km to the shore. Yet here in England, we allow dredging to take place way closer than that. If this application is granted, it will be criminally irresponsible, at a time when manmade climate change is threatening in any case to raise sea levels and is already worsening winter storms.
I intend on Friday to ask a set of awkward questions of the dredgers; if they cannot adequately reply, then they owe it to the people of East Anglia to withdraw their application and take a more sensible, precautionary approach, rather than wading in and ruining our fragile coastline forever.
 
n.b. There is a useful briefing at http://www.marinet.org.uk/mad/madbrief.html 
See also http://www.marinet.org.uk/mad/scientificstudies.html  http://www.marinet.org.uk/mad/meetingdredgers.html.
 http://www.marinet.org.uk/mad/disappearingcoastline.html 
30. 31. 32.